View 1: The foreign subsidiary is a non resident company and and hence the income will not be taxable in India. But the dividend received from subsidiary will be added in profit of the holding company and hence taxable.
View 2: As reading material may be helpful in understanding the intricacies of the issue involved.Which may be quoted as :"Modified tests to be applied for determining ‘residence' of a company and application of Controlled Foreign Company Rules (CFC Rules), being introduced for the first time in the country on the lines of such rules prevalent in the developed economies, in the revised Direct Taxes Code Bill, 2010 (the Code) will have far reaching implications on the tax liability of Indian companies having presence in multiple nations (Indian MNCs).
Variety of structures used by Indian MNCs to hold investments abroad or to retain profits abroad for reinvestment or for carrying on operations in multiple jurisdictions may satisfy the test of “residence” contained in S4 of the Code or be covered by the CFC Rules and income accruing, arising or received in foreign jurisdictions may attract tax liability in India.
Besides an Indian company (essentially, a body corporate, formed or established under an Indian law and having a registered or principal office in India), any company which has its place of effective management in India, at any time during the year, will satisfy the test of residence for taxation purposes.
At present, besides Indian company, a company, control and management of whose affairs is situated wholly in India during that year, satisfied the test of residence in India.
Effective management
The expression, “place of effective management” is explained in S 314(192) as:
“(i) the place where the board of directors of the company or its executive directors, as the case may be, make their decisions; or
(ii) in a case where the board of directors routinely approve the commercial and strategic decisions made by the executive directors or officers of the company, the place where such executive directors or officers of the company perform their functions.”
Take an example of a subsidiary of an Indian company located, say, in Germany. The German subsidiary has its own board of directors; holds board meetings in Germany and the board performs its normal functions in Germany.
Two officers of the Indian holding company, located in India, are directors of the German subsidiary. The board of directors of the German subsidiary generally endorses commercial decisions of the head quarters/officers located in India.
Such a case could satisfy both the tests set out in (i) and (ii) above. First condition refers, inter alia, to the place where its executive directors make their decisions. The term “executive director” is not defined in the Code and in common parlance, it would mean an executive who is serving on the board of directors.
The second condition could also be satisfied as the boards of directors of the German subsidiary routinely approve the decisions of the Indian directors who are located in India and who perform their functions in India.
Operating decisions
This could apply with greater force where the Indian directors participate in the board of directors meeting through video or audio calls from India since, in that case, it could be said that the board decisions are also taken in India.
This, of course, would be a debatable issue as to whether participation of directors in the meeting of board of directors through video or audio calls where such directors do not constitute majority of the board but, who, in reality, take such decisions would satisfy the second or, for that matter, even the first condition.
A distinction is, however, required to be made between operating decisions and commercial and strategic decisions. In common parlance, operating decisions relate to day to day operations, processes and procedures relating to business functions and like whereas, commercial and strategic decisions would refer to decisions relating to business at policy level.
So, what are the consequences? If the effective management is held to be in India, entire income of the foreign subsidiary would become liable to tax in India as it would be regarded as resident in India."
Search This Site
Friday, December 3, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
News Archive
-
►
2022
(3)
- ► September 2022 (1)
- ► August 2022 (1)
- ► April 2022 (1)
-
►
2021
(12)
- ► October 2021 (1)
- ► April 2021 (1)
- ► March 2021 (1)
-
►
2020
(252)
- ► December 2020 (8)
- ► November 2020 (5)
- ► October 2020 (12)
- ► September 2020 (5)
- ► August 2020 (1)
- ► April 2020 (29)
- ► March 2020 (52)
- ► February 2020 (26)
- ► January 2020 (79)
-
►
2019
(694)
- ► December 2019 (42)
- ► November 2019 (59)
- ► October 2019 (116)
- ► September 2019 (32)
- ► August 2019 (32)
- ► April 2019 (77)
- ► March 2019 (105)
- ► February 2019 (73)
- ► January 2019 (71)
-
►
2018
(361)
- ► December 2018 (103)
- ► November 2018 (96)
- ► October 2018 (149)
- ► August 2018 (11)
- ► February 2018 (2)
-
►
2017
(11)
- ► April 2017 (7)
- ► January 2017 (4)
-
►
2016
(605)
- ► August 2016 (6)
- ► April 2016 (132)
- ► March 2016 (72)
- ► February 2016 (154)
- ► January 2016 (42)
-
►
2015
(1356)
- ► December 2015 (76)
- ► November 2015 (94)
- ► October 2015 (86)
- ► September 2015 (142)
- ► August 2015 (42)
- ► April 2015 (92)
- ► March 2015 (233)
- ► February 2015 (94)
- ► January 2015 (42)
-
►
2014
(1256)
- ► December 2014 (54)
- ► November 2014 (52)
- ► October 2014 (83)
- ► September 2014 (102)
- ► August 2014 (120)
- ► April 2014 (128)
- ► March 2014 (259)
- ► February 2014 (201)
- ► January 2014 (119)
-
►
2013
(2600)
- ► December 2013 (195)
- ► November 2013 (59)
- ► October 2013 (172)
- ► September 2013 (407)
- ► August 2013 (219)
- ► April 2013 (217)
- ► March 2013 (473)
- ► February 2013 (241)
- ► January 2013 (219)
-
►
2012
(2695)
- ► December 2012 (213)
- ► November 2012 (168)
- ► October 2012 (253)
- ► September 2012 (173)
- ► August 2012 (278)
- ► April 2012 (256)
- ► March 2012 (310)
- ► February 2012 (289)
- ► January 2012 (184)
-
►
2011
(1842)
- ► December 2011 (228)
- ► November 2011 (316)
- ► October 2011 (188)
- ► September 2011 (167)
- ► August 2011 (138)
- ► April 2011 (194)
- ► March 2011 (151)
- ► February 2011 (22)
- ► January 2011 (17)
-
▼
2010
(14)
-
▼
December 2010
(14)
- France to introduce 'Google tax' from January 1
- House panel seeks to push date for IFRS switch by ...
- Mahajan & Aibara
- Morpheus 's Vacancy Details
- Corporate Search & Placements Pvt. Ltd. 's Vacancy...
- Jitendra Chablani &co's Vacancy Details
- PARAKH & KAPOOR's Vacancy Details
- K.B.JAIN & ASSOCIATES's Vacancy Details
- Free lecture on IFRS
- B.P.Rao & Co's Vacancy Details
- Rao Associates's Vacancy Details
- Whether income of the foreign subsidiary of an Ind...
- Proposal for CPT pass criteria to 30%
- Kaun Banega Crorepati winners does not take the en...
-
▼
December 2010
(14)
No comments:
Post a Comment