CA NeWs Beta*

Search This Site

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Emapnelment of CA - Uttar Pradesh Water Sector Restructuring Project - Lucknow

Expression of Interest for Providing Consultancy Service for Hiring
Services of a Chartered Accountant Firm for an Internal Audit of PACT
& Project divisions of UPWSRP situated at Districts for the period
from Nov 2010 to Oct 2011.

Address: Uttar Pradesh Water Sector Restructuring Project Walmi
Bhawan, Utrethia, Telibagh, Lucknow- 226026 Uttar Pradesh, India
Phone: 0522-2441631 (539)
Email: proc_expert_pact@idup.gov.in
http://pdicai.org/docs/tendUPWSRP9062011.gif

WHETHER THE ASSESEE WHO BECAME LIABLE TO PAY THE TAX AS IT WAS NOT DEDUCTED AT SOURCE ALSO BECAME LIABLE TO PAY INTEREST UNDER SECTION 234B OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961?

WHETHER THE ASSESEE WHO BECAME LIABLE TO PAY THE TAX AS IT WAS NOT DEDUCTED AT SOURCE ALSO BECAME LIABLE TO PAY INTEREST UNDER SECTION 234B OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961?
:


INTRODUCTION:

Part A of Chapter XVII of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`Act' for short) deals with the general provision for the collection and recovery of tax. Sec. 190(1) provides that notwithstanding the fact that the regular assessment in respect of any income is to be made in a later assessment year, the tax on such income shall be payable by deduction at source or by advance payment in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter. Section 191 provides that in case of income in respect of which a provision is not made under this Chapter for deducting income tax at the time of payment and in any case, where income tax has not been deducted in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter, the income tax shall be payable by the assessee directly.

TAX DEDUCTED AT SOURCE:

Part B of Chapter XVII of the Act deals with deduction of tax at source. Sec. 192 to 206B of the Act deals the same. Section 192(1) provides that any person responsible for paying any income chargeable under the head `salaries' shall at the time of payment, deduct income tax on the amount payable at the average rate of income tax computed on the basis of the rates in force for the financial year in which the payment is made, on the estimated income of the assessee under the head for that financial year. Section 200 provides that the person who deducts tax is required to pay the same to the Central Government within the prescribed period and a certificate for the tax deducted is required to be issued under Section 203 to the person from whom the tax has been deducted.

Section 201 provides that if the person responsible to deduct the tax at source fails to deduct the whole or any part of the tax or after deducting the tax fails to pay the tax as required under the Act, the person responsible would be treated as an assessee in default in respect of the tax. Section 201(1A) provides that if such person does not deduct the tax or having deducted, failed to pay the tax, he shall be liable to pay simple interest at 15% per annum on the amount of such tax from the date on which it was deductible to the date on which it was actually paid. Under Section 204 the expression `the person responsible for paying' in the case of payment of income chargeable under the head `salaries' means the employer.

From the combined reading of the above said sections, it is clear that as soon as tax is deducted at source by the person responsible to make the payment, the liability of the assessee to pay the tax gets discharged. If the tax is not deducted, it remains payable by the assessee directly. The assessee is required to pay the tax directly which would be at the stage of self assessment and not by way of advance tax. The liability to pay interest under Section 201(1A) is on the person who fails to deduct the tax at source is absolute and is upon the person responsible for deducting at source till the date it was actually paid.

ADVANCE PAYMENT OF TAX:

Part C of Chapter XVII of the Act deals with the advance payment of tax. Section 207 provides that the tax shall be payable in advance during a financial year in accordance with the provisions of Sections 208 to 219 of the Act, in respect of the total income of the assessee which would be chargeable to tax. Section 208 provides that advance tax is payable during the financial year where the amount of such tax payable by the assessee during that year, as computed in accordance with provisions of this Chapter exceeds the prescribed amount or more. The amount of advance tax payable by an assessee in the financial year shall be computed in accordance with the method provided under Sec. 209 of the Act. While computing the advance tax payable under Section 209 the income tax calculated is required to be reduced by the amount of income tax which would be deductible during the financial year in accordance with the provisions of Sections 192 to 194, 194A, 194C, 194D and 195.

Section 234B of the Act provides that where the advance tax paid by an assessee under the provisions of Section 210 is less than 90% of the assessed tax, the assessee shall be liable to pay simple interest at the rate of one and one fourth per cent for every month or part of a month comprised in the period from the 1st day of April next following such financial year to the date of determination of total income under Section 143(1) where a regular assessment is made, to the date of such regular assessment on an amount equal to the assessed tax or, as the case may be, on the amount by which the advance tax paid as aforesaid falls short of the assessed tax.

ISSUE:

The issue taken up for discussion in this article is whether the assessee who became liable to pay the tax as it was not deducted at source also became liable to pay interest under Section 234B of the Act. The issue will be discussed with decided case laws.

CASE LAWS:

In `CIT V. Madras Fertilizers Limited' – 1983 -TMI - 27991 – (MADRAS High Court) the Madras High Court held that whenever there was a possibility of deduction of tax at source, the person who had failed to deduct the tax at source was liable to pay interest and not the assessee as otherwise there would be charging of interest twice on payment of tax in relation to the same income.

In `CIT V. Ranoli Investment P Limited' 1998 -TMI - 16558 – (GUJARAT High Court) the High Court held that the liability to pay interest is on the payer for non deduction of tax under Section 215 of the Act and that the assessee was not liable to pay interest.

In `Sedco Forex International Drilling Co. Limited' – 2003 -TMI - 11559 – (UTTARANCHAL High Court) the High Court held that interest was not payable by the assessee under Section 234B of the Act on account of non deduction of tax at source by the employer.

In `CIT V. Halliburton Offshore Services Inc.' 2004 -TMI - 10846 – (UTTARANCHAL High Court) the High court held that the income tax appellate tribunal was justified in holding that interest under Section234B of the Act could not be charged since the entire income of the assessee was subject to TDS whereas interest was chargeable on the assessed tax as defined by Explanation 1 under Section 234 B of the Act.

In `CIT V. Tide Water Marine International Inc.' – 2008 -TMI - 32735 – (UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT) the assessee was subject to tax deduction at source. The assessee was a non resident foreign company and was engaged by another non resident company M/s Hundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd in the business of exploration and production of mineral oils. The employer M/s Hundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd. did not deduct the tax at source from the income of the assessee. The Assessing Officer, while assessing the tax of the assessee on the income shown in its return, directed that interest would be charged under Section 234B of the Act, since advance tax was not paid. The assessee being aggrieved, filed an appeal which was dismissed and thereafter filed a second appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, who allowed the appeal holding that the interest was not payable by the assessee under Section 234B of the Income Tax Act as the assessee himself was not liable to deduct the source in order to pay advance tax under Section 208 of the Act. The Department being aggrieved by the order of the Tribunal filed an appeal before the High Court under Sec. 260A of the Act. The High Court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the order of the Tribunal holding that the assessee was not liable to pay interest under Section 234B of the Act for the default committed by the employer, who was liable to deduct the tax at source.

In `DIT V. Maersk Co. Ltd' – (2011) 334 ITR 79 (Uttarkhand) (FB) the assessee is a non resident company and had a contract for supply of technicians to ONGC in respect of which hire charges had been received by it. MCL was required to provide technicians to ONGC. The Department treated the assessee (MCL) as an agent of the employees and issued a notice under Section 148. The Assessing Officer assessed the income of the assessee under Sections 143(3)/147 and 163 of the Act and held that since the income of the assessee under the agent company was liable to pay interest under Sections 234A and 234B of the Act. The assessee filed appeal against this order. The appellate authority partly allowed the appeal and remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer to reconsider the levy of interest under Sec. 234B of the Act. The Department being aggrieved against the order filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal who dismissed the appeal being devoice of merit. The Department filed appeal before High Court. The Division Bench held that if the assessee is liable to be taxed in India, then it is obligation to pay advance tax and if he fails to pay the advance tax he is liable to pay interest thereon under Section 234B of the Act. Since this view is contrary to the decision taken by the Division Bench in another case `CIT V. Tide Water Marine International Inc' (Supra) the matter was referred to Larger bench.

Before the Full Bench the Department put forth the following arguments:

In the facts and circumstances of the present case, section234B of the Act was applicable and that the assessee was liable to pay interest for non payment of the advance tax;
Section 234B was applicable to income falling under the head `salaries';
Under Section 191 in case of a failure to deduct tax at source by the employer, the tax had to be paid by the assessee and, in case of a short fall in the payment of advance tax by the assessee, interest was liable to be paid under Section 234 B of the Act;
Even where the employer did not deduct tax at source under Sec. 192 the assessee still incurred the liability to pay interest under Section 234B of the Act;
There was no bar in imposition of interest simultaneously on the employer under Section 201(1A) or on the assessee under Section 234B and the Department had an option to recover interest either from the employer or from the assessee;
The provisions of Sec. 234B are mandatory and, therefore, interest under all circumstances was liable to be paid by the assessee.
The assessee put for the following arguments:

The advance tax is required to be paid in accordance with the provisions of Chapter XVII C of the Act;
Under Section 191 income tax is payable by the assessee at the stage of self assessment and not by way of advance tax and that the tax is payable during the assessment proceedings;
Under Section 192(1) the employer is liable to deduct the tax at source on the income under the head `salaries' at the rates in force on the estimated income;
The assessee, who is a salaried employee, is not required to pay advance tax on his salaried income inasmuch as the obligation is put upon the employer under Section 192(1) of the Ac to deduct the tax at source and if there was a short deduction of the tax at source then, in such a case, the Department had a right to move against the employer under Section 201 of the Act for the recovery of the balance tax;
Where any income was liable to tax deducted at source, Section 234B of the Act was not applicable;
Section 191 only created a liability upon the assessee to pay the tax deductible at source, but the said provision does not include the liability for payment of interest chargeable under Section 234 B on the assessee for failure on the part of his employer to deduct the tax at source.
The Full Bench is of the view that the assessee was not liable to pay advance tax under Section 208 of the Act inasmuch as the tax at source was required to be deducted by the person responsible for paying any income chargeable under the Head `Salaries' at the time of payment under Section 192 of the Act. The assessee only became liable to pay the tax directly under Section 191 of the Act since it was not deducted at source. The stage for making payment of tax could only arise at the stage of self assessment which is to be made in a later assessment year as is clear from Section 190 of the Act, whereas advance tax is liable to be paid in a financial year only and not thereafter. If the employer fails to deduct the tax at source, while paying any income chargeable under the head `salaries' would be responsible for payment of interest under Sec. 201(1A) of the Act. The Full Bench held that the assessee would not be liable to pay interest under Section 234B of the Act since he was not liable to pay advance tax under Section 208 of the Act.


Dated: - June 3, 2011
By: Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN

Sunday, June 5, 2011

Opening for CAs-Plant Finance controller for MNC

A large US based MNC to recruit Plant Controller for their Plant at Pune. Ideal candidate should be a Chartered Accountant with

WHETHER THE ASSESEE WHO BECAME LIABLE TO PAY THE TAX AS IT WAS NOT DEDUCTED AT SOURCE ALSO BECAME LIABLE TO PAY INTEREST UNDER SECTION 234B OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961?


WHETHER THE ASSESEE WHO BECAME LIABLE TO PAY THE TAX AS IT WAS NOT DEDUCTED AT SOURCE ALSO BECAME LIABLE TO PAY INTEREST UNDER SECTION 234B OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961?
:


INTRODUCTION:

Part A of Chapter XVII of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`Act' for short) deals with the general provision for the collection and recovery of tax. Sec. 190(1) provides that notwithstanding the fact that the regular assessment in respect of any income is to be made in a later assessment year, the tax on such income shall be payable by

I-T Dept to use power to arrest to retrieve huge tax arrears

I-T Dept to use power to arrest to retrieve huge tax arrears
The Income Tax Department is all set to crack the whip on tax
defaulters by invoking its power, which has not been used for many
years, to arrest and prosecute evaders. The step comes in the backdrop
of the government initiating various steps to curb generation of black
money in the country and also recently notifying the creation of the
first-ever

Announcement by KGMA for CA Final Students

Announcement

The next Batch for CA Final Advanced Auditing Classes for November 2011 ICAI Examination shall be commencing from July 1st, 2011. The last date of registration is June 25th, 2011. The visiting faculty would be CA Kamal Garg, Author and ICAI Faculty. For other details regarding fees, venue, etc. contact at 9953590104, 9899954015 or visit www.kgma.in

Processing of investor complaints against listed companies in SEBI Complaints Redress System - SCORES

CIRCULAR

CIR/OIAE/2/2011 June 3, 2011

All Companies whose securities are listed on Stock Exchanges
(through Stock Exchanges)
All recognized Stock Exchanges

Dear Sir/Madam,


Sub: Processing of investor complaints against listed companies in SEBI Complaints Redress System (SCORES)


1. SEBI has commenced processing of investor complaints in a centralized webbased complaints redress system ‘SCORES’. The salient features of this system are:



• Centralised database of all complaints,

• Online movement of complaints to the concerned listed companies,

• Online upload of Action Taken Reports (ATRs) by the concerned companies, and

• Online viewing by investors of actions taken on the complaint and its current status.



2. All complaints pertaining to companies will be electronically sent through

Taxman May Soon Keep 24x7 Watch on Crorepatis

CBDT panel proposes dedicated cell to monitor earnings and spending of rich taxpayers

High net worth individuals, or HNIs, may soon be subject to intense year-round scrutiny by income-tax officials. A panel constituted by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, or CBDT, has proposed setting up a dedicated cell to monitor those earning over

COMPANIES CAN REGISTER IN 24 HRS

COMPANIES CAN REGISTER IN 24 HRS
BS REPORTER New Delhi, 4 June


Come July, you can register a company in India in 24 hours! The Union ministry of corporate affairs has set the first week of July as the target date for launching a completely digitised service that will allow anyone with all relevant documents and approvals to complete the process of

Thursday, June 2, 2011

IFRS carve-outs wide-ranging by Parthiv Mehta

The converged Indian Accounting Standards have about 69 major and
minor carve-outs.

Converged Indian Accounting Standards are notified with some major
carve-outs and deferrals of certain critical standards and
interpretations to suit the local purposes apart from major departures
for the first time convergence. The Ministry is reportedly open for

3 Things to Avoid when Scheduling Meetings

Scheduling meetings is hard. Finding a time that works for 15 people
in four time zones can be a logistical nightmare. Here are three
things to keep in mind next time this arduous task falls in your lap:

Revised Schedule VI not to apply for Nov.11 CA Exams

Announcement Regarding Non-Applicability of Revised Schedule VI in November, 2011 Examination - (01-06-2011)

Date: 31.5.2011
This is to bring to the attention of students that a decision has been taken to defer the applicability of the Revised Schedule VI for CA examination, consequent to which the same will not be applicable for the PCC, IPCC and Final examinations to be held in November, 2011.
Accordingly, in the list of publications/amendments relevant for November 2011 examination published in Students’ Journal “The Chartered Accountant Student”, the following portions given in column (4) of the table below are to be excluded:

Increase in rate of interest on deposits by Bank of India raises up to 2.5 per cent

Bank of India raises deposit rate by up to 2.5 per cent



State-owned Bank of India (BoI) today raised fixed deposit rates on various maturities by up to 2.5 per cent.
The bank increased the interest rate by 250 basis points (2.5 per cent) to 5.50 per cent for term deposits of 31-45 days' tenor. The deposit rate increase is the maximum in this slab, the bank informed the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE).

For fixed deposits with a tenor between 15-30 days, the new interest rate will be 4.50 per cent against the existing 2.75 per cent, while 46-90 days fixed deposits will attract an interest rate of 5.50 per cent, an increase of 150 basis points

Auditors in China burned by cash balance scandals

Bank balances under scrutiny as scandals mushroom
* Electronic confirmations needed, experts say

* Dozens of US-listed Chinese firms under accounting cloud

By Dena Aubin

NEW YORK, May 31 (Reuters) - A rash of Chinese accounting scandals has raised questions about whether audit firms are doing enough to detect fake money trails and confirm companies' cash, the most basic number auditors are supposed to check.

The risks in auditing bank balances came to the fore last week when

Chanakya Quotes: Bitter pill

जनपदार्थं ग्रामं त्यजेत्॥३८३॥
ग्रामार्थं कुटुम्बस्त्यज्यते॥३८४॥

कुटुम्बार्थं पुत्रस्तज्यते॥३८४॥
आत्मार्थं सर्वं त्यज्यते॥३८४॥
चाणक्यसूत्राणि
janapadārthaṁ grāmaṁ tyajet||383||
grāmārthaṁ kuṭumbastyajyate||384||
kuṭumbārthaṁ putrastajyate||384||
ātmārthaṁ sarvaṁ tyajyate||384||
cāṇakyasūtrāṇi

This is one of the most important advices of Chanakya regarding priorities in human relationships. The idea is more or less echoed in viduraneethi of Mahabharatam.
For the welfare of the Country, one may have to sacrifice the interests of his native village. When it comes to the interests of his native village, one has to give it priority over his own family. If the family's welfare is compromised because of a son, such son should be abandoned in the interest of the family. And if one's good name and uplift of the soul are at stake, one has to sacrifice all he has to redeem his name and soul.

Uplift of the soul and one's good name should not be construed as selfishness. If a human being cannot exist without sacrificing his good name and the purity of his soul, it is better that he dies, because without these he has lost his identity and genuine existence already.
If a situation will arise where the presence of a wayward son would ruin the family as a whole, the son should be abandoned. Dhritarashtra failed to do this in Duryodhana's case and the result was that the entire family was annihilated the a gory battle of Kurukshetra.
Family as a safe and secure unit is the dearest possession of every person. But if the family as a whole becomes a threat to the welfare and existence of the bigger unit of a village, the interests of such village should take precedence over the family. This is more so because without the edifice of a well established and mutually cordial set of people whose activities in co-operation alone can ensure social stability, it may become necessary to sacrifice the particular interests of the family to a great extent because the family will lose its relevance in the absence of the wider setup.
And sure, if one finds that the inhabitants of his village are indulging in activities that would endanger the unity and the sovereignty of his nation, the interests of the nation should be upheld even by abandoning the sectoral interests. The spirit of patriotism should take precedence over anything else.
The ideas would appear very difficult to digest but the bitter pills will have to be swallowed if one is unwell and eager to redeem his health

I-T dept plans to accept refund applications at ATMs

AFTER tying up with banks for providing tax deducted at source (TDS) details through internet banking and payment of tax at ATMs (automated teller machines), the income tax department is planning to

Exemption under s 10B , 01 June 2011 - Decided on: 11 May 2011

Merely because the assessee had been permitted to establish a new industrial undertaking for the manufacture of computer software as 100% EOU under the STP scheme was itself not enough to record a finding that the said unit had in fact been

CA, ICWA and Semi-Qualified CA/ CWA Urgently Reqd at Chhtisgarh/ MP

A well-established CA firm having Corporate Office at New Delhi & 7 offices across India at Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai, Bangalore, Chandigarh, Ranchi & Muzaffarpur (Bihar) and a team of 8 full time partners.

Just now, has been allotted continuous (concurrent) audit of South Eastern Coalfields Ltd, Gevra Area (Distt: Korba, Chhatisgarh) for which it requires following professionals on full time basis (Boarding/ Lodging and Travelling will be arranged by us at our cost):-


-1 CA/ ICWA with at least 3 years of post qualification experience on full time basis.

-3 qualified Inter CA/ ICWA on full time basis.


The firm invites suitable from individuals & firms from Chhatisgarh/ Madhya Pradesh to work as partners/ employees for this assignment and also for our forthcoming branch office.


Kindly send your proposal urgently on gks@gksureka.com or speak on mobile: 09811077186.

Opening For Direct Taxes in manufacturing entity.

Urgent opening in a leading manuacturing company having turnover of around 2000 crores. 2years experience in direct taxes is desirable. Salary will be best in industry. Send CV to

TRANSFER PRICING

Transfer pricing refers to the setting, analysis, documentation, and adjustment of charges made between related parties for goods, services, or use of property (including intangible property). Transfer prices among components of an enterprise may be used to reflect allocation of resources among such components, or for other purposes. OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines state, “Transfer prices are significant for both taxpayers and tax administrations because they determine in large part the income and expenses, and therefore taxable profits, of associated enterprises in different tax jurisdictions.”

Many governments have adopted transfer pricing rules that apply in determining or adjusting income taxes of domestic and multinational taxpayers. The OECD has adopted guidelines followed, in

Extension of time for filing DIN4

DIN4_extension of date.jpg

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and Chartered Institute of Management Accountants agree to offer new CGMA designation

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and Chartered Institute of Management Accountants agree to offer new CGMA designation

New AICPA-CIMA designation -- Chartered Global Management Accountant -- to advance knowledge and practice of management accounting worldwide

LONDON / WASHINGTON, DC (May 23, 2011) – The governing bodies of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, headquartered in London, today agreed on creation of a new professional designation, the Chartered Global Management Accountant, that will be a worldwide standard of professional excellence in management accounting.

With approval now given by the AICPA and CIMA councils, the two accounting bodies will create the new CGMA designation to give management accountancy a higher profile in the United States and promote the professional development of management accountants across the globe. Backing the new CGMA designation will be an AICPA-CIMA joint venture with international resources and experience in management accounting, business and cultural knowledge.

CIMA president George Glass said: 'We are delighted that management accountancy is to be given a strong new global impetus by this joint venture. This advances our strategic aims and will ensure management accountants, committed to strict ethical standards, will receive world-class support in a fast-globalizing world.'

'This is truly an historic moment for management accounting and the accounting profession worldwide.' AICPA chairman Paul Stahlin said. 'Our joint venture with CIMA creates long-term strategic value for our members and literally opens up the world for US CPAs in management accounting.'

CIMA is the largest professional body in the world focused exclusively on management accounting and the AICPA is the world’s largest professional accounting organization with members in a wide range of accounting and financial executive roles. Together, the new venture will cover more than 550,000 members and students worldwide.

The new AICPA and CIMA joint venture will promote and establish the CGMA as the preeminent, globally recognized management accounting designation. The joint venture will combine the strength of the AICPA in North America with CIMA’s presence in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia and elsewhere.

CIMA chief executive Charles Tilley said: 'The new CGMA will be recognized throughout the world as the gold-standard designation for management accountants who play a vital role in building sustainable business value. The joint venture will raise the profile of the profession and be a passport for careers throughout the world.'

'Economic globalization is a reality for all businesses now and in the future and so it’s critical that we have a universally accepted standard of excellence for management accounting,' said AICPA president and CEO Barry Melancon. 'Combining that commitment to excellence with ethics and integrity, the CGMA will help produce and recognize top management accounting professionals worldwide.'

It is proposed that the new CGMA letters will be issued to members early in 2012. AICPA voting members with at least three years working in management accounting or a financial management role would qualify for an accelerated route to obtaining the new designation. Those holding the new designation will commit to a programme of developing and maintaining competency in management accounting as well as leadership and strategy.

This knowledge base will be derived from an expert-panel assessment of skills and competencies needed to succeed in various career paths in management accounting. CIMA members, all of whom hold either an ACMA or FCMA, will be entitled to use the letters ACMA CGMA or FCMA CGMA if they wish to. The new CGMA will be issued by the AICPA and CIMA through a license with the joint venture, with membership remaining with the existing organizations.

The AICPA and CIMA had announced their proposal to form a joint venture on March 28, 2011.

I-T - Whether recording of satisfaction of AO of searched person is a condition

I-T - Whether recording of satisfaction of AO of searched person is a condition precedent for AO of third person to initiate block assessment if any part of undisclosed income was said to have belonged to third person - YES: Delhi HC

MCA:~ Updated Financial Statements n Annual Return filing made mandatory before recording any Event Based Information~

Press Information Bureau
Government of India
Ministry of Corporate Affairs
02-June-2011 13:43 IST

Compliance of Provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and Rules Made There Under
In order to ensure corporate governance and proper compliances of provisions of Companies Act, 1956, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs has decided that from 3rd July, 2011 all the Companies will have to file their updated Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Accounts and Annual Return with the Registrar of Companies before recording any event based information / changes made and no request, whether oral, in writing or through e-forms will be accepted in this regard.
This decision is a follow up of the instances of filing only the event based information with the Registrar of Companies by some companies without filing their up to date Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Accounts and Annual Return.
It has also been decided that No e-filing shall be accepted by the Registrar of Companies from Directors of these defaulting companies for any other company also.
Company Secretaries and Auditors of these companies will also not be allowed to sign and certify the filing with MCA-21 system, in respect of these defaulting Companies, till the defect is rectified.
Members of ICAI, ICSI and ICWAI must not issue any certificates to such defaulting companies other than above mentioned e-forms. And, action will be taken against the defaulting companies and their Directors/ officers in default in co-ordination with RBI and SEBI.
Though, this order will not apply to such companies where the Balance Sheet and Annual Return could not be filed due to order of court / company law board or any other competent authority and concerned ROC has marked this company as having management dispute.
However, in the interest of other stakeholders following event based information / changes will continue to be accepted by the Registrar of Companies from such defaulting companies: -
Forms
Subject
Form 32
Particulars of appointment of managing director, directors, manager and secretary and the changes among them or consent of candidate to act as a managing director or director or manager or secretary of a company and / or undertaking to take and pay for qualification shares. [Pursuant to sections 303(2) or 266(1) (a) and 266 (1) (b) (iii) of the Companies Act, 1956]
Form 20 B
Form for filing annual return by a company having a share capital with the Registrar.[Pursuant to Section 159 of the Companies Act, 1956]
Form 21A
Particulars of annual return for the company not having share capital.
[Pursuant to Section 160 of the Companies Act. 1956]
Form DIN-3
Intimation of Director Identification Number by the company to the
Registrar.
Form 21
Notice of the court or the company law board order.
[Pursuant to section 17(1), 17A, 79, 81(2), 81(4), 94A (2, 102(1), 107(3),
115(5), 141, 155, 167, 186, 391(2), 394(1), 396, 397, 398, 445, 466, 481,
559 and 621A of the Companies Act, 1956]
Form 23AC &
23 ACA
Form for filing balance sheet and Profit & Loss account and other documents with the Registrar.
[Pursuant to section 220 of the Companies Act, 1956]
Form 1 INV
Forms for deposit of money into IEPF.
Form 23 B
Information by Auditor to Registrar
Form 66
Form for submission of compliance certificate with the Registrar
Forms related to Cost Audit Branch
Investor Complaint Form
It may be noted that Section 610 of the Companies Act, 1956 confers a right to any person to inspect any document kept with the Registrar of Companies under the Act. The Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Accounts and Annual Return of any company are the basic documents which are required to be filed with Registrar of Companies annually as required under section 220 and 159 of the Companies Act, 1956.

ITR VOL 334 PART 2 and itr (trib) vol 9 part 6

INCOME TAX REPORTS (ITR)

Volume 334 : Part 2 (Issue dated 6-6-2011)

SUBJECT INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART

HIGH COURTS

Business expenditure --Capital or revenue expenditure--Company--Expenditure on raising convertible debentures--Revenue expenditure--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 37-- CIT v. ITC Hotels Ltd. (Karn) . . . 109

----Deduction only on actual payment--Contribution to employees' State insurance--Disallowed as deposited beyond due date--Amendment to first proviso to section 43B by Finance Act, 2003 with retrospective effect--Applicable--Assessee entitled to deduction--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 43B-- CIT v. Rai Agro Industries Ltd. (P&H) . . . 122

----Deduction only on actual payment--Disallowance on ground that expenses related to prior period and not present assessment year--Tribunal finding all expenses settled in current year and covered under section 43B(d)--Justified--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 43B(d)-- CIT v. Modipon Ltd. (No. 1 ) (Delhi) . . . 102

----Deduction only on actual payment--Excise duty paid in advance--Assessing Officer holding that deduction can be claimed only on removal of goods from factories--Not proper--Assessee entitled to deduction--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 43B-- CIT v. Modipon Ltd. (No. 2 ) (Delhi) . . . 106

----Disallowance--Travelling expenses--Addition made in subsequent years accepted by assessee--To be followed this year also--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 37--Income-tax Rules, 1962, r. 6D-- CIT v. Modipon Ltd. (No. 2 ) (Delhi) . . . 106

Capital gains --Company--Sale of property by company--Company not in liquidation--Section 49 not applicable--Capital gains assessable in hands of company--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 45, 49-- CIT v. Shashi Charla (Delhi) . . . 129

----Exemption--Long-term capital gains--Investment of net consideration from transfer of depreciable asset under Capital Gains Deposit Account Scheme--Assessee entitled to exemption--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 54F-- CIT v. Rajiv Shukla (Delhi) . . . 138

----Full value of consideration--Provision for adopting value assessed for stamp duty purposes--Provision not beyond legislative competence and not violative of article 14--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 50C--Constitution of India, art. 14 ; Sch VII, List I, entry 82-- Bhatia Nagar Premises Co-operative Society Ltd . v. Union of India (Bom) . . . 145

Company --Computation of book profits under section 115JB--Depreciation--Change in method of computation of depreciation from straight line method to written down value method--Change reflected in profit and loss account audited and certified by registering authority under company law--Change valid--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 115JB-- CIT v. Tidel Park Ltd. (Mad) . . . 126

Exemption --Export oriented industry--Conditions precedent for exemption--Conditions should be satisfied in initial year of manufacture or production--Value of machinery and plant in initial year of manufacture more than 20 per cent. of total value of machinery and plant--Purchase of new machinery and value reduced to less than 20 per cent. in a subsequent year--Assessee not entitled to exemption under section 10B--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 10B-- Sami Labs Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (Karn) . . . 157

Export --Special deduction--Computation--Income from duty drawback, duty entitlement pass book and duty-free remission scheme--To be treated as business income--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 80HHC-- CIT v. F. C. Sondhi and Co. P. Ltd .(P&H) . . . 141

Income from undisclosed sources --Purchasers found to be fictitious--Addition to income valid--Purchases by account payee cheques--Inability to produce purchaser after three years--Not material--Addition not justified--Income-tax Act, 1961-- Diagnostics v. CIT (Cal) . . . 111

Interpretation of taxing statutes --Words-- CIT v. Oceanic Shipping Service of M. T. Suhail (Guj) . . . 132

Non-resident --Shipping business--Conditions precedent for application of section 172--Carriage of goods shipped at Indian port--Tug towing ship which could not sail by itself--No carriage of goods--Section 172 not applicable--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 172-- CIT v. Oceanic Shipping Service of M. T. Suhail (Guj) . . . 132

Revision --Commissioner--Jurisdiction--Amendment to section 263 permitting revision of orders of Inspecting Assistant Commissioner--Not retrospective--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 263-- CIT v. Smt. Asha M. Primlani (Delhi) . . . 143

Valuation of closing stock --Excise and customs duties--Assessee entitled to exclude excise and customs duties paid from value of closing stock--Income- tax Act, 1961-- CIT v. Modipon Ltd. ( No. 2 ) (Delhi) . . . 106

Wealth-tax --Appeal to Appellate Tribunal--Contradiction in Tribunal's order regarding valuation of land--Recall of order by Tribunal--Tribunal holding no contradiction in its findings--Amounts to review of its earlier order--Not permissible--Tribunal directed to reconsider matter--Wealth-tax Act, 1957, ss. 7(4), 24-- Raja Malwinder Singh v. CWT (P&H) . . . 115

Words and phrases --"Shipping" and "goods"--Meanings of-- CIT v. Oceanic Shipping Service of M. T. Suhail (Guj) . . . 132

Writ --Capital gains--Development agreement to develop property of assessee--Reference by developer--Determination of stamp duty payable--Developer paying--Assessee cannot challenge valuation by stamp valuation authority--Remedy available under Stamp Act--Bombay Stamp Act, 1958, ss. 31, 53 ; Sch. I, art. 5(ga)--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 50C-- Bhatia Nagar Premises Co-operative Society Ltd. v. Union of India (Bom) . . . 145


SECTIONWISE INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART

Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 :

S. 31, 53 ; Sch. I, art. 5(ga) --Writ--Capital gains--Development agreement to develop property of assessee--Reference by developer--Determination of stamp duty payable--Developer paying--Assessee cannot challenge valuation by stamp valuation authority--Remedy available under Stamp Act-- Bhatia Nagar Premises Co-operative Society Ltd. v. Union of India (Bom) . . . 145

Constitution of India :

Art. 14 ; Sch VII, List I, entry 82 --Capital gains--Full value of consideration--Provision for adopting value assessed for stamp duty purposes--Provision not beyond legislative competence and not violative of article 14-- Bhatia Nagar Premises Co-operative Society Ltd . v. Union of India (Bom) . . . 145

Income-tax Act, 1961 :

S. 10B --Exemption--Export oriented industry--Conditions precedent for exemption--Conditions should be satisfied in initial year of manufacture or production--Value of machinery and plant in initial year of manufacture more than 20 per cent. of total value of machinery and plant--Purchase of new machinery and value reduced to less than 20 per cent. in a subsequent year--Assessee not entitled to exemption under section 10B-- Sami Labs Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (Karn) . . . 157

S. 37 --Business expenditure--Capital or revenue expenditure--Company--Expendi-ture on raising convertible debentures--Revenue expenditure-- CIT v. ITC Hotels Ltd. (Karn) . . . 109

----Business expenditure--Disallowance--Travelling expenses--Addition made in subsequent years accepted by assessee--To be followed this year also-- CIT v. Modipon Ltd. (No. 2) (Delhi) . . . 106

S. 43B --Business expenditure--Deduction only on actual payment--Contribution to employees' State insurance--Disallowed as deposited beyond due date--Amendment to first proviso to section 43B by Finance Act, 2003 with retrospective effect--Applicable--Assessee entitled to deduction-- CIT v. Rai Agro Industries Ltd. (P&H) . . . 122

----Business expenditure--Deduction only on actual payment--Excise duty paid in advance--Assessing Officer holding that deduction can be claimed only on removal of goods from factories--Not proper--Assessee entitled to deduction-- CIT v. Modipon Ltd. ( No. 2) (Delhi) . . . 106

S. 43B(d) --Business expenditure--Deduction only on actual payment--Disallowance on ground that expenses related to prior period and not present assessment year--Tribunal finding all expenses settled in current year and covered under section 43B(d)--Justified-- CIT v. Modipon Ltd. (No. 1 ) (Delhi) . . . 102

S. 45 --Capital gains--Company--Sale of property by company--Company not in liquidation--Section 49 not applicable--Capital gains assessable in hands of company-- CIT v. Shashi Charla (Delhi) . . . 129

S. 49 --Capital gains--Company--Sale of property by company--Company not in liquidation--Section 49 not applicable--Capital gains assessable in hands of company-- CIT v. Shashi Charla (Delhi) . . . 129

S. 50C --Capital gains--Full value of consideration--Provision for adopting value assessed for stamp duty purposes--Provision not beyond legislative competence and not violative of article 14-- Bhatia Nagar Premises Co-operative Society Ltd . v. Union of India (Bom) . . . 145

----Writ--Capital gains--Development agreement to develop property of assessee--Reference by developer--Determination of stamp duty payable--Developer paying--Assessee cannot challenge valuation by stamp valuation authority--Remedy available under Stamp Act-- Bhatia Nagar Premises Co-operative Society Ltd. v. Union of India (Bom) . . . 145

S. 54F --Capital gains--Exemption--Long-term capital gains--Investment of net consideration from transfer of depreciable asset under Capital Gains Deposit Account Scheme--Assessee entitled to exemption-- CIT v. Rajiv Shukla (Delhi) . . . 138

S. 80HHC --Export--Special deduction--Computation--Income from duty drawback, duty entitlement pass book and duty-free remission scheme--To be treated as business income-- CIT v. F. C. Sondhi and Co. P. Ltd . (P&H) . . . 141

S. 115JB --Company--Computation of book profits under section 115JB--Depreciation--Change in method of computation of depreciation from straight line method to written down value method--Change reflected in profit and loss account audited and certified by registering authority under company law--Change valid-- CIT v. Tidel Park Ltd. (Mad) . . . 126

S. 172 --Non-resident--Shipping business--Conditions precedent for application of section 172--Carriage of goods shipped at Indian port--Tug towing ship which could not sail by itself--No carriage of goods--Section 172 not applicable-- CIT v. Oceanic Shipping Service of M. T. Suhail (Guj) . . . 132

S. 263 --Revision--Commissioner--Jurisdiction--Amendment to section 263 permitting revision of orders of Inspecting Assistant Commissioner--Not retrospective-- CIT v. Smt. Asha M. Primlani (Delhi) . . . 143

Income-tax Rules, 1962 :

R. 6D --Business expenditure--Disallowance--Travelling expenses--Addition made in subsequent years accepted by assessee--To be followed this year also-- CIT v. Modipon Ltd. (No. 2) (Delhi) . . . 106

Wealth-tax Act, 1957 :

S. 7(4) --Wealth-tax--Appeal to Appellate Tribunal--Contradiction in Tribunal's order regarding valuation of land--Recall of order by Tribunal--Tribunal holding no contradiction in its findings--Amounts to review of its earlier order--Not permissible--Tribunal directed to reconsider matter-- Raja Malwinder Singh v. CWT (P&H) . . . 115

S. 24 --Wealth-tax--Appeal to Appellate Tribunal--Contradiction in Tribunal's order regarding valuation of land--Recall of order by Tribunal--Tribunal holding no contradiction in its findings--Amounts to review of its earlier order--Not permissible--Tribunal directed to reconsider matter-- Raja Malwinder Singh v. CWT (P&H) . . . 115

ITR'S TRIBUNAL TAX REPORTS (ITR (TRIB))

Volume 9 : Part 6 (Issue dated : 06-06-2011)

SUBJECT INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART

Appeal to Appellate Tribunal --Issue raised by assessee answered in its favour by Commissioner (Appeals)--Assessee cannot challenge decision in appeal to Tribunal--Income-tax Act, 1961-- ITO v. United Marine Academy [SB] (Mumbai) . . . 639

----Order of Tribunal--Where facts not disputed, no additional arguments advanced and Tribunal fully agreeing with reasons given by Commissioner (Appeals), Tribunal need not repeat reasons given by him--Order of Tribunal not illegal on that ground--Income-tax Act, 1961-- Asst. CIT v. Safe Enterprises (Mumbai) . . . 533

Bad debts --Change of law--Assessee only to write it off as bad debt--Not required to prove that debts had become bad-- Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 36(1)(vii)-- Asst. CIT v. Safe Enterprises (Mumbai) . . . 533

----Disallowance--Entire bad debts written off in books of account maintained under Income-tax Act--Separate books maintained under Companies Act not relevant--Assessee claiming only that sum which has been written off--To be allowed--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 36(1)(vii)-- Asst. CIT v. Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. (Chennai) . . . 543

Business expenditure --Disallowance--Payments subject to tax deduction at source --Amendment of section 40(a)(ia) by Finance Act, 2010--Amendment retrospective--Tax deducted at source from freight charges during period 1-4-2005 to 28-2-2006 and paid in July and August 2006 i.e. before due date for filing return--Freight charges could not be disallowed in assessment for 2006-07--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 40(a)(ia) -- Bansal Parivahan (India) P. Ltd. v. ITO (Mumbai) . . . 565

----Disallowance--Payments to non-resident subject to deduction of tax at source--Interest--Difference between definition of interest in Interest-tax Act and that in Income-tax Act--Discounting charges not interest for purposes of Income-tax Act--Tax not deductible at source on discounting charges--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 2(28A), 40(a)(i)--Circular No. 647, dated 22-3-1993-- Asst. CIT v. Cargill Global Trading (I) P. Ltd. (Delhi) . . . 558

----Firm--Expenditure on education of partner in foreign country--No evidence of commercial expediency in incurring expenditure--Expenditure not deductible--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 37-- Kohinoor Cloth Stores v. Asst. CIT (Pune) . . . 585

Business loss --Corporate guarantee given to subsidiary company--Granting of guarantee part of business of assessee--Guarantee given for commercial purposes--Loss due to such guarantee--Deductible as business loss--Income-tax Act, 1961-- Asst. CIT v. W. S. Industries (India) Ltd. (Chennai) . . . 596

Capital gains --Computation of capital gains--Two fictions in sections 50 and 50C--Section 50 modifies expression "cost of acquisition"--Section 50C modifies expression "full value of consideration"--Both operate in different fields--Both can be applied simultaneously--Sale of block of assets including land--Stamp duty valuation of land can be taken into consideration for computing capital gains--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 45, 50, 50C-- ITO v. United Marine Academy [SB] (Mumbai) . . . 639

Capital or revenue expenditure --Royalty paid for using logo--Payment for non-exclusive user of logo based on turnover and not lump sum payment--Revenue expenditure--Income-tax Act, 1961-- Asst. CIT v. Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. (Chennai) . . . 543

Charitable purposes --Definition--Change of law--"Object of general public utility" not to include activity of rendering service in relation to trade, commerce or business--Board constituted under law as regulatory board for environment protection and pollution control--Not rendering service in relation to trade, commerce or business--Registration not to be cancelled--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 2(15), 12AA-- Himachal Pradesh Environment Protection and Pollution Control Board v. CIT (Chandigarh) . . . 604

Non-banking financial company --Long-term capital loss--Carry forward--Assessee compelled to divest shares in accordance with RBI directions--Assessing Officer not doubting genuineness of transactions--Similar issue decided in favour of assessee in previous years--To be allowed--Income-tax Act, 1961-- Asst. CIT v. Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. (Chennai) . . . 543

----Securities--Diminution in value--Classified as investment and income earned in nature of dividends--Investments in securities a statutory direction which has to be necessarily complied with assessee--Classification under "investments" immaterial--Assessee entitled to claim of diminution in value of securities which held for purpose of its business--Income-tax Act, 1961-- Asst. CIT v. Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. (Chennai) . . . 543

Non-resident --Double taxation avoidance--Interest on refund of tax deducted at source from receipts of permanent establishment--Provisions of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement more beneficial and applicable--Payment of tax responsibility of foreign company--Collection of tax at source not effective connection of indebtedness with permanent establishment in India--Amount taxable under article 11(2) of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 90--Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between Australia and India, art. 11(2)-- Asst. CIT v. Clough Engineering Ltd. [SB] (Delhi) . . . 618

Words and phrases --"Interest"-- Asst. CIT v. Cargill Global Trading (I) P. Ltd. (Delhi) . . . 558


SECTIONWISE INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART

Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between Australia and India :

Art. 11(2) --Non-resident--Double taxation avoidance--Interest on refund of tax deducted at source from receipts of permanent establishment--Provisions of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement more beneficial and applicable--Payment of tax responsibility of foreign company--Collection of tax at source not effective connection of indebtedness with permanent establishment in India--Amount taxable under article 11(2) of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement-- Asst. CIT v. Clough Engineering Ltd. [SB] (Delhi) . . . 618

Income-tax Act, 1961 :

S. 2(15) --Charitable purposes--Definition--Change of law--"Object of general public utility" not to include activity of rendering service in relation to trade, commerce or business--Board constituted under law as regulatory board for environment protection and pollution control--Not rendering service in relation to trade, commerce or business--Registration not to be cancelled-- Himachal Pradesh Environment Protection and Pollution Control Board v. CIT (Chandigarh) . . . 604

S. 2(28A) --Business expenditure--Disallowance--Payments to non-resident subject to deduction of tax at source--Interest--Difference between definition of interest in Interest-tax Act and that in Income-tax Act--Discounting charges not interest for purposes of Income-tax Act--Tax not deductible at source on discounting charges--Circular No. 647, dated 22-3-1993-- Asst. CIT v. Cargill Global Trading (I) P. Ltd. (Delhi) . . . 558

S. 12AA --Charitable purposes--Definition--Change of law--"Object of general public utility" not to include activity of rendering service in relation to trade, commerce or business--Board constituted under law as regulatory board for environment protection and pollution control--Not rendering service in relation to trade, commerce or business--Registration not to be cancelled-- Himachal Pradesh Environment Protection and Pollution Control Board v. CIT (Chandigarh) . . . 604

S. 36(1)(vii) --Bad debts--Change of law--Assessee only to write it off as bad debt--Not required to prove that debts had become bad-- Asst. CIT v. Safe Enterprises (Mumbai) . . . 533

----Bad debts--Disallowance--Entire bad debts written off in books of account maintained under Income-tax Act--Separate books maintained under Companies Act not relevant--Assessee claiming only that sum which has been written off--To be allowed-- Asst. CIT v. Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. (Chennai) . . . 543

S. 37 --Business expenditure--Firm--Expenditure on education of partner in foreign country--No evidence of commercial expediency in incurring expenditure--Expenditure not deductible-- Kohinoor Cloth Stores v. Asst. CIT (Pune) . . . 585

S. 40(a)(i) --Business expenditure--Disallowance--Payments to non-resident subject to deduction of tax at source--Interest--Difference between definition of interest in Interest-tax Act and that in Income-tax Act--Discounting charges not interest for purposes of Income-tax Act--Tax not deductible at source on discounting charges--Circular No. 647, dated 22-3-1993-- Asst. CIT v. Cargill Global Trading (I) P. Ltd. (Delhi) . . . 558

S. 40(a)(ia) -- Business expenditure--Disallowance--Payments subject to tax deduction at source--Amendment of section 40(a)(ia) by Finance Act, 2010--Amendment retrospective--Tax deducted at source from freight charges during period 1-4-2005 to 28-2-2006 and paid in July and August 2006 i.e. before due date for filing return--Freight charges could not be disallowed in assessment for 2006-07-- Bansal Parivahan (India) P. Ltd. v. ITO (Mumbai) . . . 565

S. 45 --Capital gains--Computation of capital gains--Two fictions in sections 50 and 50C--Section 50 modifies expression "cost of acquisition"--Section 50C modifies expression "full value of consideration"--Both operate in different fields--Both can be applied simultaneously--Sale of block of assets including land--Stamp duty valuation of land can be taken into consideration for computing capital gains-- ITO v. United Marine Academy [SB] (Mumbai) . . . 639

S. 50 --Capital gains--Computation of capital gains--Two fictions in sections 50 and 50C--Section 50 modifies expression "cost of acquisition"--Section 50C modifies expression "full value of consideration"--Both operate in different fields--Both can be applied simultaneously--Sale of block of assets including land--Stamp duty valuation of land can be taken into consideration for computing capital gains-- ITO v. United Marine Academy [SB] (Mumbai) . . . 639

S. 50C --Capital gains--Computation of capital gains--Two fictions in sections 50 and 50C--Section 50 modifies expression "cost of acquisition"--Section 50C modifies expression "full value of consideration"--Both operate in different fields--Both can be applied simultaneously--Sale of block of assets including land--Stamp duty valuation of land can be taken into consideration for computing capital gains-- ITO v. United Marine Academy [SB] (Mumbai) . . . 639

S. 90 --Non-resident--Double taxation avoidance--Interest on refund of tax deducted at source from receipts of permanent establishment--Provisions of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement more beneficial and applicable--Payment of tax responsibility of foreign company--Collection of tax at source not effective connection of indebtedness with permanent establishment in India--Amount taxable under article 11(2) of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement-- Asst. CIT v. Clough Engineering Ltd. [SB] (Delhi) . . . 618

IFRS Certificate Program readies CPAs for global business --USA

AICPA's IFRS Certificate Program readies CPAs for global business
The AICPA recently launched the IFRS Certificate Program to help CPAs
understand and apply International Financial Reporting Standards, meet
marketplace demands and enjoy enhanced career opportunities. Through
the program, the AICPA's most ambitious educational resource on IFRS
to date, a Certificate of Educational Achievement will be given for
completion of a comprehensive and integrated curriculum of 25 online
self-study courses offering a broad foundation in IFRS. This marker of
competence in implementing IFRS enables CPAs to demonstrate their
knowledge of IFRS to current and potential employers and clients in
the expanding and increasingly open global marketplace.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
For mobile version of this site click here


News Archive