ADIT vs. BHEL-GE-Gas Turbine Servicing (ITAT Hyderabad)

ADIT vs. BHEL-GE-Gas Turbine Servicing (ITAT Hyderabad)



Fees for "routine technical repairs" not assessable as "fees for technical services"

The assessee paid sums to foreign parties for repairing and refurbishment of equipment. The AO held that the payments constituted "fees for technical services" u/s 9(1)(vii) and that the assessee ought to have deducted TDS u/s 195 r.w.s. 201 though the assessee argued that as there was no intellectual aspect involved in the repairs and refurbishment activity, it was no assessable as "fees for technical services". The CIT (A) allowed the claim. On appeal by the department to the Tribunal, HELD dismissing the appeal:

The activities carried out by the foreign parties involved assembly, disassembly, inspection, reporting and evaluation. These are routine maintenance repairs and do not involve services of technical nature so as to be assessable as "fees for technical services" u/s 9(1)(vii). Routine repairs do not constitute `FTS' as they are merely repair works and not technical services. Technical repairs are different from `technical services' (Lufthansa Cargo 274 ITR (AT) 20 (Del) followed; Mannesmann Demag 26 ITD 198(Hyd) distinguished)



Related Judgements
Ashapura Minichem vs. ADIT (ITAT Mumbai) The argument that in using the words "in the Contracting State", Article 12(4) incorporates the "place of performance test" and negates the "source rule" and that services rendered offshore are not taxable is not acceptable for two reasons. Firstly, because the expression "provision for services" is wider than the…
Van Oord ACZ Marine Contractors BV vs. ADIT (ITAT Chennai) While it is true that reimbursement of expenditure is not income, the payment made by the subsidiary to the assessee cannot be regarded as a "reimbursement" because (a) the subsidiary had no technical expertise to carry out the contract & the assessee had rendered technical services to it such…
DCIT vs. Andaman Sea Food Pvt Ltd (ITAT Kolkata) The department's argument that if the sum is not assessable as "fees for technical services", it is assessable as "other income" Article 23 of the DTAA is not acceptable because that Article applies only to "items of income which are not expressly mentioned in the foregoing Articles of this…