Finance Bill, 2015 has amended the definition of ‘service’ under clause (44) of section 65B

Amendment made by Finance Bill, 2015 (w.e.f. notified date)

Finance  Bill, 2015 has amended the definition of ‘service’ under clause (44) of section 65B. Explanation - 2 has been substituted as under:

‘Explanation 2. - For the purposes of this clause, the expression “transaction in money or


actionable claim” shall not include--

(i)   any activity relating to use of money or its conversion by cash or by any other mode, from one form, currency or denomination, to another form, currency or denomination for which a separate consideration is charged;

(ii)  any activity carried out, for a consideration, in relation to, or for facilitation of, a transaction in money or actionable claim, including the activity carried out--

(a)  by a lottery distributor or selling agent in relation to promotion, marketing, organising, selling of lottery or facilitating in organising lottery of any kind, in any other manner;

(b)  by a foreman of chit fund for conducting or organising a chit in any manner.'

Thus, the scope of transaction in money has been expanded to include both, transaction in money or actionable claim.  By sub clause [a(ii)], a transaction in money or actionable claim are excluded  from the meaning of ‘service’. With the new explanation, following services or activities have been carved out of the exclusion clause [a(ii)] and these shall now be taxable from a notified date :

(a)  money transactions for a separate consideration charged

(b)  service or facilitation of transactions in money or actionable claim for a consideration. This would specifically include.

(i)   services of a lottery distribution or selling agent as defined in clause (31A) of section 65B inserted by Finance Bill, 2015

(ii)  services of a foreman of chit fund for organizing or conducting a chit as defined in clause (23A) of section 65B inserted by Finance Bill, 2015.

Amendment made by Finance Bill, 2015 in Consideration (w.e.f. enactment date)

The definition of 'consideration' as provided in clause (a) of explanation to section 67 has been substituted to enlarge its scope and specifically provide that it would include reimbursement of expenses, subject to conditions as prescribed in rules and amount retained as margin or discount by the distributor or selling agent of lotteries, in addition to commission or discount received, i.e. difference in the face value of lottery ticket and price at which such distributor or selling agent gets the ticket. The substituted meaning of 'consideration' reads as under:

 “ 'consideration' includes-

(i)   any amount that is payable for the taxable services provided or to be provided;

(ii)  any reimbursable expenditure or cost incurred by the service provider and charged, in the course of providing or agreeing to provide a taxable service, except in such circumstances, and subject to such conditions, as may be prescribed;

(iii) any amount retained by the lottery distributor or selling agent from gross sale amount of lottery ticket in addition to the fee or commission, if any, or, as the case may be, the discount received, that is to say, the difference in the face value of lottery ticket and the price at which the distributor or selling agent gets such ticket."

CBEC clarification on the amendment vide Letter DOF No. 334/ 5/2015-TRU dated 28.02.2015 clarifies as follows -

"Section 67 prescribes for the valuation of taxable services. It is being prescribed specifically in this section that consideration for a taxable service shall include:

(a)  all reimbursable expenditure or cost incurred and charged by the service provider. The intention has always been to include reimbursable expenditure in the value of taxable service. However, in some cases courts have taken a contrary view. Therefore, the intention of legislature is being stated specifically in section 67.

(b)  amount retained by the distributor or selling agent of lottery from gross sale amount of lottery ticket, or, as the case may be, the discount received, that is the difference in the face value of lottery ticket and the price at which the distributor or selling agent gets such tickets."

The objective of the amendment has been to -

nullify the decision of Delhi High Court in Intercontinental Consultants and Technocrats Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India 2012 (12) TMI 150 - DELHI HIGH COURT, on taxability of reimbursement of expenses, and

specifically provide for taxing discount (or margin) retained or collected by lottery distributors or selling agents.