Source: Money control
Vodafone share prices fall by 40% from days high
Hearing the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) plea in regard to the adjusted gross revenue (AGR) case, a bench of the Supreme Court of India on March 18 held that no further objections to its orders would be allowed against payable dues.
In its order, the three-judge bench led by Justice Mishra, and comprising Justices S Abdul Nazeer and MR Shah held that no self-assessment can be done and no further objection would be entertained.
The SC order stated: "No self-assessment can be done and no further objection would be entertained. Actions of telcos are tantamount to seeking to bypass our judgement. All dues as per our judgement
will have to be paid, including interest and penalty. The Solicitor General's plea seeking reasonable time will be considered. Do not appreciate telcos' actions and will hold MDs personally accountable."
The proceedings
“Our order is clear, no further objections to be allowed against payable dues,” said Justice Arun Mishra. The same bench - comprising Mishra, Nazeer and Shah had upheld the DoT definition of AGR in the court ruling on October 24, 2019.
Mishra also questioned the telecom companies’ self-assessment. “Where did the concept of self-assessment come in? Who permitted self-assessment without permission of the court? This is sheer contempt of court,” Justice Mishra observed.
The bench further added that the DoT demand was confirmed by the court and self-assessment cannot be allowed when “our order clearly spells out the dues”.
“DOT demand has been confirmed by this court, how can there be self-assessment? This cannot be allowed when our order clearly spells out the dues. This is impermissible,” Justice Mishra said.
He added that some players (telcos) have suggested that they would require 8-10 months’ time to corroborate numbers of self-assessment, but “this can’t be allowed.”
“Dues have been finalised by the court, no backtracking can be allowed for that. Are we fools?! Can’t we understand what's happening?” he stated.
The Vodafone Idea counsel tells court: “We are not seeking recomputation. DoT had made some errors in calculation and licence fee was charged twice in some places.”
Mishra, however, observed that “every company is violating orders”.
“Won’t tolerate this. Companies want to hoodwink us. If required we will summon the MDs of all the telcos. Telcos are the usurpers of public money and don’t even want to pay a fraction of revenue earned,” Justice Mishra stated.
He further observed that companies were “trying to influence the court through the media”. “This is tantamount to seeking a review of our judgement. Please summon the dot officials responsible for self-assessment. Withdraw the DoT move to allow self-assessment. There can be no further exercise regarding the dues payable. If a reassessment is permitted it will be a fraud on this court,” he added.
Mishra further observed that actions of telcos are tantamount to seeking to “bypass our judgement” and that no further objection can be entertained.
Case background
On March 16, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta appearing for the DoT had sought staggered payment over 20 years of AGR dues by telecom companies. The plea also asked that telcos not be charged a penalty and interests on penalty and principal beyond the date of the judgement.
Telcos will instead be charged an 8 percent interest on the staggered payments, CNBC-TV18 reported. Seeking the apex court’s approval, the DoT said the proposal was made based on a formula arrived at after detailed deliberations by the government and the Cabinet.
Citing adverse impact on the telecom and banking sectors, DoT also requested the SC to SC to modify its October 2019 AGR judgement and subsequent orders. In October 2019, the top court upheld the DoT's new definition of AGR and has ordered telcos to clear total dues of Rs 1.47 lakh crore.
Vodafone Idea, Bharti Airtel, and Tata Teleservices owe the highest amounts to the DoT.
Vodafone share prices fall by 40% from days high
Hearing the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) plea in regard to the adjusted gross revenue (AGR) case, a bench of the Supreme Court of India on March 18 held that no further objections to its orders would be allowed against payable dues.
In its order, the three-judge bench led by Justice Mishra, and comprising Justices S Abdul Nazeer and MR Shah held that no self-assessment can be done and no further objection would be entertained.
The SC order stated: "No self-assessment can be done and no further objection would be entertained. Actions of telcos are tantamount to seeking to bypass our judgement. All dues as per our judgement
will have to be paid, including interest and penalty. The Solicitor General's plea seeking reasonable time will be considered. Do not appreciate telcos' actions and will hold MDs personally accountable."
The proceedings
“Our order is clear, no further objections to be allowed against payable dues,” said Justice Arun Mishra. The same bench - comprising Mishra, Nazeer and Shah had upheld the DoT definition of AGR in the court ruling on October 24, 2019.
Mishra also questioned the telecom companies’ self-assessment. “Where did the concept of self-assessment come in? Who permitted self-assessment without permission of the court? This is sheer contempt of court,” Justice Mishra observed.
The bench further added that the DoT demand was confirmed by the court and self-assessment cannot be allowed when “our order clearly spells out the dues”.
“DOT demand has been confirmed by this court, how can there be self-assessment? This cannot be allowed when our order clearly spells out the dues. This is impermissible,” Justice Mishra said.
He added that some players (telcos) have suggested that they would require 8-10 months’ time to corroborate numbers of self-assessment, but “this can’t be allowed.”
“Dues have been finalised by the court, no backtracking can be allowed for that. Are we fools?! Can’t we understand what's happening?” he stated.
The Vodafone Idea counsel tells court: “We are not seeking recomputation. DoT had made some errors in calculation and licence fee was charged twice in some places.”
Mishra, however, observed that “every company is violating orders”.
“Won’t tolerate this. Companies want to hoodwink us. If required we will summon the MDs of all the telcos. Telcos are the usurpers of public money and don’t even want to pay a fraction of revenue earned,” Justice Mishra stated.
He further observed that companies were “trying to influence the court through the media”. “This is tantamount to seeking a review of our judgement. Please summon the dot officials responsible for self-assessment. Withdraw the DoT move to allow self-assessment. There can be no further exercise regarding the dues payable. If a reassessment is permitted it will be a fraud on this court,” he added.
Mishra further observed that actions of telcos are tantamount to seeking to “bypass our judgement” and that no further objection can be entertained.
Case background
On March 16, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta appearing for the DoT had sought staggered payment over 20 years of AGR dues by telecom companies. The plea also asked that telcos not be charged a penalty and interests on penalty and principal beyond the date of the judgement.
Telcos will instead be charged an 8 percent interest on the staggered payments, CNBC-TV18 reported. Seeking the apex court’s approval, the DoT said the proposal was made based on a formula arrived at after detailed deliberations by the government and the Cabinet.
Citing adverse impact on the telecom and banking sectors, DoT also requested the SC to SC to modify its October 2019 AGR judgement and subsequent orders. In October 2019, the top court upheld the DoT's new definition of AGR and has ordered telcos to clear total dues of Rs 1.47 lakh crore.
Vodafone Idea, Bharti Airtel, and Tata Teleservices owe the highest amounts to the DoT.
No comments:
Post a Comment