Enclosed
are the following recent decisions of the Mumbai Tribunal:
Name
of the Party
|
Authority/Court
|
In
favour of
|
Issue
Involved
|
Dinesh
R. Vora
|
Mumbai
ITAT
|
Assessee
|
- The
Tribunal held that exemption under section 54 of the Act would be
admissible in respect of capital gains earned on the sale of four residential
flats executed through single sale agreement if the same are invested in
one residential house.
|
M/s.
Varun Shipping Co. Ltd.
|
Mumbai
ITAT
|
Assessee
|
- The
Tribunal held that no disallowance under section 14A of the Act could be
made in a case where scheme of Tonnage Tax is applicable as the same is
a separate code in itself.
|
M/s
Forbes Gokak Ltd.
|
Mumbai
ITAT
|
Assessee
|
- The Tribunal
held that no penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act could be levied
where disallowance/addition is made based on a subsequent decision of
Supreme Court.
|
M/s.
HSBC Securities and
Capital
Markets (India) Private
Limited
|
Mumbai
ITAT
|
Assessee
|
- The Tribunal
held that in case of a share broker, liability on account of Securities
Transaction Tax (‘STT’) is the liability of the clients of
the assessee who are buying and selling shares and, therefore, the
provisions of section 40(a)(ib) will be applicable in those cases and it
is because of this reason, the rebate under section 88E is also
allowable in case of buyer/seller of shares under section 88E of the
Act. The assessee is only a broker who has collected STT on behalf of
the stock exchanges and has paid the same to the latter. Accordingly, it
has been held that STT is required to be excluded while computing the
income of the assessee from brokerage.
- The Tribunal
held that payment made by stock broker to stock exchanges on account of
unfair trade practice and un-business like conduct is not for violation
of law and, therefore, cannot be disallowed under Explanation to section
37(1) of the Act.
|
--
By
Rohit Garg
B.Com(H), ACA,LLB
No comments:
Post a Comment