CA NeWs Beta*: Summary of SA 505 External Confirmations

Search This Site

Friday, July 10, 2015

Summary of SA 505 External Confirmations

1.     Summary of SA 505
External Confirmations
External confirmation
Process of obtaining Audit Evidence by direct communication with the third party
Objective
To obtain relevant & reliable audit evidence

Who prepares the confirmation request
Auditor
Who sends the confirmation request
Management, after approving the auditor for making such confirmation.
To whom the confirmation requests are sent
Confirming party
Matters on which external confirmations can be made
Matters regarding Account Balances & their elements such as :-
v  Debtor balance;
v  Creditor balance;
v  Bank balance;
v  Stock held by Third Parties;
v  Property Title deeds held by Third Parties;
v  Investments purchased but delivery not taken.
Auditor’s obligations
v  To make the external confirmations,
v  To evaluate the reliability of External confirmations;
v  To perform additional audit procedures in case of :-
·         Non-receipt of External confirmations,
·         Doubt over reliability of Confirmation Received.
Process of External Confirmations
Management refusal to make confirmations
The auditor shall evaluate :-
v   validity of reasons for refusal;
v  Implications on Auditor’s Assessed risk
whether the auditor is satisfied with the reason given by the management for refusal
Auditor’s obligations
Yes
Perform Additional procedures to obtain Audit evidences
NO
Communicate the matter to TCWG; &
Determine the implications on the audit & the auditor’s opinion
Types of Confirmation Requests
Basis
Positive confirmation
Negative Confirmation
Meaning
It asks the respondent to reply directly to the auditor in each and every circumstance, whether he agrees or disagrees upon the matter asked in the confirmation request. .
Negative confirmation is simply a professional way for an auditor to say "don't bother me unless there is a problem."
Cases when required
When the auditor is of opinion that a positive
confirmation request is necessary in the existing circumstances  to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, such as :-
v  Information related to confirmation is only available with the outside entity;
v  High risk of specific fraud or the risks of collusion which can involve employees and/or management, prevent the auditor from relying on evidence from the entity. 
v  when the accounting controls of a company have historically had very few errors and are thus considered to be strong
v  Risk of material misstatement is very low;
v  Small no. of balances;
v  The auditor is not aware of circumstances or conditions that would cause recipients of negative confirmation requests to disregard such requests



Text Box: Point to be Noted:- 1. Confirmation request is though prepared by the auditor but it is sent to the confirming party by the management only after the authorization to auditor for such confirmation. 2. A response to a confirmation request may contain restrictive language regarding its use. Such restrictions do not necessarily invalidate the reliability of the response as audit evidence. 3. Oral response given by the confirming party does not fulfil the criteria of external confirmation. Therefore, auditor shall ask the party to give written confirmation. 4. Exceptions noted in responses to confirmation requests may indicate misstatements or potential misstatements in the financial statements. 5.  Some exceptions do not represent misstatements.  For example,  The auditor may conclude that differences in responses to confirmation requests are due to timing, measurement, or clerical errors in the external confirmation procedures.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
For mobile version of this site click here


News Archive

Recommended Post Slide Out For Blogger