In the recent case, Delhi High Court
has given it verdict against the constitutionally validity of Rule 5 of
the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006.
This decision will have implication for all the assessees providing consulting/technical service to client.
Extract of decision
The petitioner was a company providing
consulting engineering services. It was specialises in highways,
structures, airports, urban and rural infrastructure projects and was
engaged in various road projects outside and inside India.
In the course of the carrying on of its
business, the petitioner rendered consultancy services in respect of
highway projects to the national highway authority of India (NHAI). The
petitioner receives payments not only for its service but is also
reimbursed expenses incurred by it such as air travel, hotel stay, etc.
It was paying service tax in respect of amounts received by it for
services rendered to its clients. It was not paying any service tax in
respect of the expenses incurred by it, which was reimbursed by the
clients.
The department has raised the demand
for service tax on the reimbursement considering the rule 5 of Service
Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006.
In the decision Delhi High Court mentioned
"In the aforesaid backdrop of the basic
features of any legislation on tax, we have no hesitation in ruling
that rule 5 (1) which provides for inclusion of the expenditure or costs
incurred by the service provider in the course of providing the taxable
service in the value for the purpose of charging service tax is ultra
vires section 66 and 67 and travels much beyond the scope of those
sections. To that extent it has to be struck down as bad in law"
Intercontinental Consultants and Technorats Pvt. Ltd. Vs U.O.I. & ANR.
No comments:
Post a Comment