Competition Act: Where Commission had without independently analysing facts and evidence collected by Jt. DG during course of investigation abdicated its duty and mechanically approved findings recorded by Jt. DG that conduct of appellant film association in limiting and controlling exhibition of film rights was anti-competitive, findings recorded by Jt. DG were perverse and had to be set aside

Competition Act: Where Commission had without independently analysing facts and evidence collected by Jt. DG during course of investigation abdicated its duty and mechanically approved findings recorded by Jt. DG

that conduct of appellant film association in limiting and controlling exhibition of film rights was anti-competitive, findings recorded by Jt. DG were perverse and had to be set aside

[2015] 63 taxmann.com 130 (CAT - New Delhi)

COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI

Andhra Pradesh Film Chamber of Commerce, Hyderabad

v.

Cinergy Independent Film Service (P.) Ltd., Mumbai