The Gujarat High Court has vide order dated 30.03.2016 in Percy Cawas
Kavina vs. UOI Special Civil Application No. 4926 of 2016 directed an
ad-interim stay of Notification No. 18/2016-ST and Notification No.
9/2016 – ST with respect to the levy of service-tax on senior advocates.
Some experts opined that notwithstanding the stay, it may be desirable for senior advocates to comply
with the law, get the registration, collect the service tax and deposit the same with the Government. They expressed the concern that if the levy is upheld at a later point of time (even several years later), the senior advocates may have to deposit the service-tax with interest and it may be difficult for them to recover the service tax from their clients.
Some experts opined that notwithstanding the stay, it may be desirable for senior advocates to comply
with the law, get the registration, collect the service tax and deposit the same with the Government. They expressed the concern that if the levy is upheld at a later point of time (even several years later), the senior advocates may have to deposit the service-tax with interest and it may be difficult for them to recover the service tax from their clients.
No comments:
Post a Comment