CA NeWs Beta*: Notification No. 85/2012 - Customs (N.T.)

Search This Site

Friday, September 28, 2012

Notification No. 85/2012 - Customs (N.T.)

[TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, EXTRAORDINARY, PART II, SECTION 3, SUB-SECTION (i) of dated the 26th September, 2012]
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE)
Notification No. 85/2012 - Customs (N.T.)
New Delhi, the 26th September, 2012
 
            G.S.R…..(E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) and in supersession of notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue No.16/2002-Customs (N.T.) dated the 7th March, 2002, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary vide number G.S.R. 172(E), dated the 7th March, 2002, the Central Board of Excise and Customs appoints the officers mentioned in column (2) of the Table I and Table II given below who shall have the jurisdiction in relation to an order or decision of the officer, subordinate to that officer, mentioned in column (3) of the Table I and Table II, respectively, for the purposes of the Customs Act, 1962 and  the provisions made thereunder-
Table I
S.No .
Designation of officer
Jurisdiction
(1)
(2)
(3)
1.
Chief Commissioner of Customs,  Ahmedabad
( i ) Commissioners of Customs (Appeals),   Ahmedabad – I
(ii) Commissioners of Customs (Appeals), Kandla
(iii) Commissioners of Customs (Appeals), Jamnagar
2.
Chief Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore
Commissioners of Customs (Appeals),  Bangalore
3.
Chief Commissioner of Customs, Chennai
Commissioners of Customs (Appeals), Chennai
4.
Chief Commissioner of Customs, Delhi
( i ) Commissioners of Customs (Appeals),  Delhi-I
(ii) Commissioners of Customs (Appeals),  Delhi-II
5.
Chief Commissioner of Customs, Kolkata
Commissioners of Customs (Appeals),  Kolkata
6.
Chief Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai-I
Commissioners of Customs (Appeals), Mumbai - I

7.
Chief Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai-II
Commissioners of Customs (Appeals), Mumbai –II
8.
Chief Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai III
Commissioners of Customs (Appeals), Mumbai III
Table II
Sl . No.
Designation of officer
Jurisdiction
(1)
(2)
(3)
1.
Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Ahmedabad
Commissioners of Customs, Ahmedabad, Kandla, Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) Jamnagar.
2.
Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Kandla
Commissioners of Customs, Ahmedabad, Kandla, Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) Jamnagar.
3.
Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Jamnagar
Commissioners of Customs, Ahmedabad, Kandla, Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) Jamnagar.
4.
Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Bangalore
Commissioners of Customs, Bangalore, Mangalore.
5.
Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Chennai
Commissioners of Customs, Port (Import) Chennai, Port (Export) Chennai, Airport and Aircargo Chennai, (Preventive) Chennai.
6.
Commissioner of Customs (Appeals),Delhi-I
Commissioners of Customs, Aircargo (Import and General) Delhi, Aircargo (Export) Delhi, Commissioners of Customs, (ICDs) Delhi, (Preventive), Delhi.
7.
Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Delhi -II
Commissioners of Customs, Aircargo (Import and General) Delhi, Aircargo (Export) Delhi, Commissioners of Customs, (ICDs) Delhi, (Preventive), Delhi.
8.
Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Kolkata
Commissioners of Customs, (Port) Kolkata,
(Airport) Kolkata, (Preventive) West-Bengal.
9.
Commissioner of Customs (Appeals),Mumbai-I
Commissioners of Customs (General), Mumbai, (Import) Mumbai, (Export) Mumbai,
10.
Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Mumbai-II
Commissioners of Customs, (Import) Nhava Sheva and Container Freight Station Mulund,  (Export) Nhava Sheva.
11.
Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Mumbai-III
Commissioners of Customs, (Airport) Mumbai, Aircargo (Export) Mumbai, Aircargo (Import) Mumbai, (Preventive) Mumbai:
        Provided that a Chief Commissioner of Customs, within his jurisdiction, specify, the jurisdiction of a Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) and jurisdiction of such Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) shall be limited to the jurisdiction so specified.”   
           
 [F.No. 450/88/2012-Cus.IV]
(M.V. Vasudevan)

No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
For mobile version of this site click here


News Archive

Recommended Post Slide Out For Blogger