Queens Educational Society vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
S.
10(23C)(v) & (vi): Mere surplus does not mean institution is
existing for making profit. The predominant object test must be applied.
The AO must verify the activities of the institution from year to year
The 13th proviso to Section 10(23C) is of great importance in that
assessing authorities must
continuously monitor from assessment year to
assessment year whether such institutions continue to apply their
income and invest or deposit their funds in accordance with the law laid
down. Further, it is of great importance that the activities of such
institutions be looked at carefully. If they are not genuine, or are not
being carried out in accordance with all or any of the conditions
subject to which approval has been given, such approval and exemption
must forthwith be withdrawn. All these cases are disposed of making it
clear that revenue is at liberty to pass fresh orders if such necessity
is felt after taking into consideration the various provisions of law
contained in Section 10(23C) read with Section 11 of the Income Tax Act
No comments:
Post a Comment