IT: Where from contracts,
no stipulations regarding working hours, academic leave or attachments had
been found which would reveal that consultant doctors were employees of assessee,
Tribunal was right in holding that there existed no relationship of employer
and employee between assessee and consultant doctors and accordingly, TDS
under section
194J would be applicable on doctors remuneration and not under
section 192
[2015] 55 taxmann.com 75
(Bombay)
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Commissioner of
Income-tax (TDS), Pune v. Grant Medical Foundation
Section 194J, read with
sections 192 and 201 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Deduction of tax at source
- Fees for technical/professional services (Doctors) - Whether where
well-known doctors in specified fields are invited to join hospitals for a
fee or honorarium and there are certain terms drawn so as to understand
relationship, then, in every case such terms and attendant circumstances
would have to be seen in their entirety before arriving at a conclusion that
there exists a employer-employee relationship and no general rule could be
laid down - Held, yes - Whether where from contracts, no stipulations
regarding working hours, academic leave or attachments had been found which
would reveal that consultant doctors were employees of assessee, Tribunal was
right in holding that there existed no relationship of employer and employee
between assessee and consultant doctors and accordingly, TDS under section
194J would be applicable on doctors remuneration and not under section 192 -
Held, yes [Para 38][In favour of assessee]
No comments:
Post a Comment