Enclosed are the following recent decisions of the High Court:
Name of the Party | Appeal No. | Date of decision | Authority/Court | In favour of | Issue Involved |
The Metal Rolling Works Ltd. | ITA(LOD) 966/ 2011 | 11.10.2011 | Bom. HC | Assessee | · The Court, on the facts of the case held that penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act could not be imposed where there was difference of opinion between assessee and AO as to the year of chargeability of capital gains. · The Court, on the facts of the case had further observed that levy of penalty was not justified where the AO by issuing various SCN itself changes the stand to be adopted. |
Yash Raj Films Private Limited | WP© No.2471 & 2472/Del/2010 | 17.10.2011 | Bom. HC | Revenue | · The Court, on the facts of the case, following the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Kelvinator India : 320 ITR 561, uphold the intiation of reassessment proceedings by the assessing officer within 4 years on the ground that there was sufficient tangible material before the AO in the form of reconciliation statement filed by the assessee and various other documents impounded during the course of survey. |
M/s BKI/HAM | I.T.A No. 34 of 2007 | 14.10.2011 | Uttaranchal HC | Assessee | · The Court, on the facts of the case, held that the assessee nonresident company was not having any installation/construction PE under Article 5(3) of India – Netherlands DTAA as the concerned project was not continued for a period of six months. · The Court, on the facts of the case, further observed that provisions of Article 5(3) of the DTAA provides a specific provision which covers the provision of Article 5 (2) of the DTAA also. |
By
Rohit Garg
B.Com(H), ACA,LLB
No comments:
Post a Comment