Enclosed are the following recent important decisions of the Delhi High Court:
Name of the Party | Appeal No. | Date of decision | Authority/Court | In favour of | Issue Involved |
Moderate Leasing & Capital Services Ltd. | ITA 137/2010 | 18.11.2011 | Delhi HC | Revenue | · The Court, on the facts of the case held that where two portfolios are maintained by the assessee, i.e., investment portfolio and stock in trade, then, if the shares sold during the particular year pertains to investment portfolio and there happens to be loss, then such loss would be capital loss; and not the revenue loss. |
Sumangal Overseas Ltd. | ITA No.174/2011 | 18.11.2011 | Delhi HC | Assessee | · The Court held that where no appeal is preferred by the assessee against the quantum order, yet, while deciding the penalty appeal, it is open to Tribunal to look into the transaction to see as to whether the claim was bona fide or it was bogus and result of falsehood. |
Kas Movie Pvt. Ltd. | ITA No. 793 of 2011 | 18.11.2011 | Delhi HC | Assessee | · The Court, on the facts of the case, held that penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act is not imposable where the return of income was filed based on experts advice and also the issue is debatable in nature where two views are clearly possible. |
By
Rohit Garg
B.Com(H), ACA,LLB
No comments:
Post a Comment