CA NeWs Beta*: PUNE ITATA DECISION IN THE CASE OF VIJAY RAMCHANDRA SHRISTH

Search This Site

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

PUNE ITATA DECISION IN THE CASE OF VIJAY RAMCHANDRA SHRISTH

Mr Vijay Ramchandra Shirsth Vs ACIT, Nashik (Dated: September 29, 2011)
Income Tax - Sections 40(a)(ia), 194C - Whether when the assessee is debarred by the clauses of the
agreement from sub-contracting the work contract undertaken, mere engagement of certain persons
for execution of part of the works without delegating any risks is to be treated as sub-contracting -
Whether provisions of Sec 194C are applicable in such a case - Whether onus to prove that the
assessee subcontracted its work is on the Revenue. - Assessee's appeal allowed : PUNE ITAT

No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
For mobile version of this site click here


News Archive

Recommended Post Slide Out For Blogger