Volume 30 Part 7 (Issue dated 16-2-2015)
Customs duty --Appeal--Appeal
to High Court--Jurisdiction--Territorial jurisdiction--Maintainability
of appeal--Assessee situated within Union Territory of Dadar and Nagar
Haveli--Omission of section 131C(b) defining, term “High Court†in
relation to Union Territories of Dadar and Nagar Haveli to be Bombay
High Court, from date to be notified--No such date notified till
date--Appeal not maintainable before Gujarat High Court--Assessee to
present appeal before Bombay High Court having territorial
jurisdiction--
Customs Act, 1962, ss. 129A, 131C-- Commissioner of Customs v . Kobian Electronics (India) P. Ltd. (Guj) . . . 504
Excise duty --Appeal--Appeal
to Appellate Tribunal--Recovery of duty--Suppression of
facts--Limitation--Extended period of limitation--Finding of suppression
while filing declaration and availing of Cenvat credit of fact
regarding material used--Without displacing this basic finding of fact,
Appellate Tribunal ought not to have disturbed order passed--Matter
remanded--Central Excise Act, 1944-- Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax v .Dewan Sugar Mills (All) . . . 506
----Rebate--Benefit
of Cenvat credit and rebate availed of on basis of mere paper
transactions--Concurrent findings of fact by authorities that
transactions fake--Conclusions based on evidence on record and not
perverse--No interference called for--Constitution of India, art.
226--Central Excise Rules, 2002, r. 18--Central Excise Act, 1944, s.
11BB--Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, r. 15(2)-- Diwan Brothers v . Union of India
(Guj) . . . 484
(Guj) . . . 484
Service Tax --Taxable
service--Rent-a-cab service--Possession and control over vehicle should
have been passed to hirer under rent-a-cab scheme for transaction to be
a taxable service--Difference between “rent-a-cab†and
“hiringâ€--Finance Act, 1994, s. 65(91), (105)(o)--Motor Vehicles Act,
1988, s. 75-- Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise v . Sachin Malhotra (Uttarakhand) . . . 511
Customs duty --Confiscation
of goods--Redemption fine--Import clearance of restricted
goods--Failure to submit valid Bureau of Indian Standard certification
or establish goods covered under exempted category--Order directing
confiscation and redemption of goods for re-export--Appeal--Home
clearance permitted instead of re-export against same fine--Department
failing to show how redemption fine low with no reference to margin of
profit--No justification for interfering with order--Bureau of Indian
Standards Act, 1986--Customs Act, 1962, s. 111(d)--Pneumatic Tyres and
Tubes for Automotive Vehicles (Quality Control) Order, 2009-- Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax v. Aban Exim P. Ltd . (Trib.-Delhi) . . . 558
----Exemption--Import
of hospital equipment--Notification requiring that imported goods be
used in specified hospitals and importer to furnish certificate to that
effect--No requirement that import to be done by hospitals listed in
notification--Not case of Department that equipment imported used by
Government hospitals and conditions of end-use not
followed--Assessee-third party importer entitled to benefit of
notification--Notification No. 21/2002-Customs, dated 1-3-2002--Customs
Act, 1962-- CCE, Customs and Service Tax v . Vishal Surgical Equipment Company
(Trib.-Bang) . . . 529
(Trib.-Bang) . . . 529
Excise duty --Valuation
of goods--Assessable value--Assessable value of transformers determined
in accordance with Cost Accounting Standard-4 by qualified chartered
accountant--No evidence to show actual quantum of oil used higher than
indicated in Cost Accounting Standard-4 and why chartered accountant’s
certificate not accepted--No case of suppression or
misdeclaration--Determination of assessable value based on quantum of
oil indicated in contract not sustainable--Central Excise Valuation
(Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000, rr. 4, 11-- Raghavendra Industries v. CCE, Customs and Service Tax (Appeals) (Trib.-Bang) . . . 525
----Valuation
of goods--Assessable value--Liquid chlorine manufactured and sold
either in own tonners or in customers’ tonners or even through
pipeline marketable as such--Cylinder testing charges for customer’s
tonners--Not includible in assessable value of liquid chlorine--Central
Excise Act, 1944-- CCE v. Grasim Industries Ltd .
(Trib.-Delhi) . . . 496
(Trib.-Delhi) . . . 496
Service tax --Cenvat
Credit--Input services--March, 2005 to March, 2011--Assessee
manufacturing vehicles and also selling motor vehicles imported from
principals abroad--Availing of credit of input services common to both
manufacturing and trading activity--Explanation added to definition of
“exempted service†with effect from 1-4-2011 not applicable--Trading
activity not a service much less an exempted service--Credit of service
tax paid on common input services to be apportioned in same ratio as
turnover of manufactured and traded cars--Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, rr.
2(e), (l) 6(3D), Expln. I, cl. c--Mercedes Benz India P. Ltd. v . CCE (Trib.-Mum) . . . 533
----Recovery
of tax--Limitation--Penalty--Assessee engaged in manufacture and
trading--Taking credit of input services exclusively used in trading
activity but not disclosing in return or documents--Extended period of
limitation available--Penalty attracted for normal period also--Central
Excise Act, 1944, s. 11AC--Finance Act, 1994, s. 73(1), proviso--Cenvat
Credit Rules, 2004, r. 15-- Mercedes Benz India P. Ltd . v. CCE (Trib.-Mum) . . . 533
1 comment:
Thanks for your great information, the contents are quiet interesting.I will be waiting for your next post. Freight Forwarders Services in Bangalore | Freight Forwarding Companies in Bangalore | Freight Forwarders Company in Bangalore
Post a Comment