MANAGERIAL REMUNERATION UNDER SECTION
197 OF THE COMPANIES ACT 2013 – AN ANALYSIS
Section 197 of CA 2013
deals with the overall maximum managerial remuneration and managerial
Remuneration in case of absence or inadequacy of profits. According to this
section, the total managerial
remuneration payable by a
public company, to its directors, including managing director and
whole-time director, and its manager in respect of any financial year shall not exceed eleven per cent. of
the net profits of that company for that financial year computed in the manner
laid down in section 198 except that the remuneration of the directors
shall not be deducted from the gross profits.
However, a company in general meeting may, with the approval of the Central Government,
authorise the payment of remuneration exceeding eleven per cent. of the net
profits of the company, subject to the provisions of Schedule V:
However , the remuneration payable to any one managing director; or
whole-time director or manager shall not exceed five per cent. of the net
profits of the company and if there is more than one such director
remuneration shall not exceed ten per cent. of the net profits to all such directors and
manager taken together;
The remuneration payable to directors who are neither
managing directors nor whole-time directors shall not exceed,—
(a) one per cent. of the net profits of the company, if there is a
managing
or whole-time director or manager;
(b) three per cent. of the net profits in any other case.
If, in any financial
year, a company has no
profits or its profits are inadequate, the company shall not pay to its
directors, including any managing or whole-time director or manager, by way of
remuneration any sum exclusive of any fees payable to directors under
sub-section (5) hereunder except in accordance with the provisions of Schedule
V and if it is not able to comply with such provisions, with the previous approval of the Central Government.
Any remuneration for services rendered by any
such director in other capacity shall not be so included if—
a)the services rendered are of a professional nature; and
b) in the opinion of the Nomination and
Remuneration Committee, if the company is covered under sub-section (1) of
section 178, or the Board of Directors in other cases, the director possesses
the requisite qualification for the practice of the profession.
In calculation of the above , the sitting fees
paid to directors for attending the board meeting will not be taken into account.
An independent director shall not be entitled to any
stock option and may receive remuneration by way of fees provided under
sub-section (5),
reimbursement of expenses for participation in the Board and other meetings and
profit related commission as may be approved by the members.
Thus , under the Companies Act 2013, independent
directors of a public company can be paid commission other than sitting fees and
reimbursement of expenses for attending the meeting provided if the
shareholders approval is available for the same.
Any amount paid in
excess to director other than prescribed under the above provisions shall be
refunded by the director and a company cannot waive the same.
In case , if a company
which has inadequacy of profits shall have to get the prior approval from Central Government in addition
to shareholders approval in excess of the limits specified in the
Schedule V ( Earlier Schedule XIII).
Every listed company shall disclose in the Board’s report, the ratio of the
remuneration of each director to the median employee’s remuneration and such
other details as may be prescribed.
Any premium paid on the
insurance policy to cover the risk for managing director or other directors or
Company Secretary shall not form the part of the above limit.
Section 197 of the Company Act 2013 also does not bar a
managing or whole-time director of a company to receive compensation from its
holding company or subsidiary provided the same should be disclosed in the
director’s report.
Any contravention of the
provisions of section 197 of CA 2013 shall end up with a fine of minimum of Rs 1 lac with a maximum of Rs 5
lacs.
Section 198 of Companies
Act 2013 prescribes the method of calculation of net profits for the purpose of
managerial remuneration.
Part II of Schedule V (
earlier Schedule XIII) – Remuneration Payable by a company in case where is no
profit or inadequacy of profit without central government is detailed below
Where Effective Capital is
|
Limit of Yearly Remuneration payable shall not exceed (Rupees)
|
(i)Negative or less than 5 Crores
|
30 lakhs
|
(ii) 5 Crores and above but less than
Rs 100 Crores
|
42 lakhs
|
(iii) 100 crores and above but less
than 250 crores
|
60 lakhs
|
(iv) 250 Crores and above
|
60 lakhs plus 9.91% of the effective capital in excess of Rs 250
crores
|
A company with
inadequate profit may pay to its managing director or whole-time director 200% of the above
mentioned managerial remuneration if shareholders have given their approval
through a special resolution.
Where the managerial person who is not holding Rs 5 lacs worth of shares or more or an employee or a director of the company not related to any director or promoter at any time during the two years prior to his appointment as a managerial person, In such cases , the company can pay to him up to maximum of 2.5% of the current relevant profits and up to 5% with the approval of shareholders by a special resolution.
No comments:
Post a Comment